The world’s leading financial regulator is ready to issue a consultation paper to several financial institutions which are preparing detailed changes to the manner foreign exchange “fixings” are being conducted.

According to sources, banks are expected by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) to support the existing system of fixings, but went into more detail than previously expected on possible changes in reducing the risk of market changes and manipulation. The FSB is due to report to the group of 20 primary economies later this year on reforms of a subsequent range of financial benchmarks and the first fruits of that have been earlier anticipated for quite some time.

Senior players in the foreign exchange markets previously thought it was more likely to take risky approach on the currency fixings, preferring to linger a bit more for the finale of approximately a dozen more regulatory investigations worldwide.

Two other sources with the knowledge of the topics for discussion with the FSB, having told Reuters that the U.K.-based officials of various financial institutions are concerned at the effect of the row which had on markets are pivotal to London’s role as a leading financial centre, had applied more pressure for faster moves to draw a line under the said row.

While a good number of various electronic and algorithmic options to the existing fixes have been exhaustively discussed, the sources said that there was no primal interest to turn away the wholesale from the current benchmarks.

It has indeed become apparent that clients want the fix to remain and at this stage which there will be no extreme changes to how it is to be calculated. However, there will still be measures to taper manipulation with most of the banks are providing some kind of input into this conversation. The next stage is that they will most likely be coming out of some sort of consultation paper wherein there are certainly going to be plans to reduce issues regarding exploitation.

Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority and the U.S. Department of Justice released investigations last year regarding alleged issues that senior traders shared market-sensitive information relevant for the London fix by utilising actual trades.

London, being one of the central focal points of the currency market accounts for some 40 % of the $5.3 trillion traded commodities on an average day.

The WM/Reuters was able to assign an particular date to exchange rates including the sterling, Swiss franc, euro and the yen will be compiled using data from various surveys and other providers.

While there have been several indications of declines in volumes of trade, asset managers and bankers all agree that overall fund management industry has continued to use the scheme despite the averred risks.

The same are more concerned with the goal of ensuring that their currency trades are done at a steady rate by which their daily currency trades are done at a stale rate identical to then one by which the current average daily asset is valued. Should rates differ, they can be registered with a loss or a gain which has to be explained to their clients later on.

Some investors may opt to consider their trading strategy, with many still concerned with tracking error and are still alternatively considering the present trading scheme to be their default choice as of the moment.

Once source said the FSB could make several number of detailed proposals on changes to the approach on how to fix orders which are primarily lodged and dealt with aversion of possible abuse.

Just recently, the financial sector bodies were all saying that the FSB’s planned preliminary report would only include several notable observations regarding the need for unified codes of conduct as well as the need for benchmarks to be set in the fluid markets. Moreover, the consultation document was still in the process of being written and that the details of the changes it will propose will deal primarily on how orders are to be dealt which are still in flux.

However, the pointed discussion among which some of the Forex industry’s primary players over methods by which orders can be placed directly by clients with third parties which can either be done by fixing matching system or through a custodial bank.

Finally, this would provide the market with a process in which it would be rather impossible or at least difficult for the speculative community-specific bank’s hedge funds, spot desk and several major asset managers in order for them to get hold of a pooled fixing order information later on.